Handal

Morofsky
Intellectual Property Attorneys
Enforcement Litigation

When your intellectual property is threatened, your business is at risk. At Handal & Morofsky, we help innovators, creators, and companies enforce their rights and defend against unjust claims across the full spectrum of intellectual property disputes.
From courtroom battles to strategic settlements, we bring deep legal expertise and business-minded solutions to protect what makes your brand, product, or idea unique.
​
Unlike almost all law firms specializing in intellectual property, Handal & Morofsky has a robust litigation and enforcement of intellectual property law practice. We litigate matters to trial before the federal courts, and the patent and trademark trial boards of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. H&M appellate practice of successfully prosecuted appeals before the federal circuit courts, and has been involved on several occasions in appellate practice before the United States Supreme Court. Our team of experienced attorneys is dedicated to helping clients protect their intellectual property rights.
​
We represent plaintiffs and defendants in all types of intellectual property disputes, including:
-
Patent Enforcement and Infringement
-
Trademark Infringement & Brand Misuse
-
Copyright Violation
-
Trade Secret Theft & Breach of Confidentiality
Whether you’re a startup defending your innovation or a global company protecting a trademark portfolio, our team delivers tailored litigation strategies focused on your business goals.
REPRESENTATIVE ENGAGEMENTS AS LEAD COUNSEL
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
-
XXXXXXXXXXX Star Athletica, LLC. v. Varsity Brands, Inc., et al. (US, 15-866)
-
XXXXXXXXX Nicassio v. Viacom International Inc., and Penguin Random House, LLC (US, 19-560)
-
XXXXXXXXX Jovanni Fashion, Limited v. Fiesta Fashions, Et Al. (US, 12-836)
-
XXXXXXXXX Capital Bridge Co., Ltd. v. IVL Technologies Ltd. (US, ?)
PATENT LITIGATION
-
XXXXXXXXXX GHS v. Selner (PTAB, DER2017-0031)
-
XXXXXXXXXXXX Floriey v. Life Pro Fitness LLC, and Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc. (EDNY, 2022)
-
XXXXXXXXXXXXX QFO Labs, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores, LP (D. Minn., 2021)
-
XXXXXXXXXX QFO Labs, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. (D. Minn., 2022)
-
XXXXXXXXXX Johnson Controls Technology Company v. BuildingIQ, Inc. (D. Del, 2021)
-
XXXXXXXX Multiwave Sensors, Inc. v. Sunsight Holdings, LLC (M.D. Fla., 2017)
-
Chu???? v Harbor Freight
-
XXXXXXX Tour Technology Systems, LLC v. VFM Leonardo, Inc.(EDNY, 2015)
-
XXXXXXXXX Conair v. Miele & Cie. Kg (SDNY, 2013)
-
XXXXXXX Tour Technology Systems, LLC v. Ice Portal (EDNY, 2014)
-
XXXXXXXXXXX Honeywell International, Inc. v Venstar (D. Minn, 2011)
-
Sears v Archer Daniels Midland adm NDNY k and L gates
-
Obtained injunction enforcing pioneering hair straightener patent involving rearrangement of disulfide bonds in human hair keratin using an equilibrium reaction. Conair Corporation v. Eurasia Concepts, Inc. (DC Conn, 2004)
-
Successfully defended patent infringement claim on behalf of manufacturer of ultrahigh vacuum semiconductor fabrication equipment. Chorus Corporation v. Riber S.A. (DC NJ, 2000)
-
Defended SNPE subsidiary against alleged infringement of patent on quick drying nail enamels, obtaining for client royalty free license and major purchase by patent holder of product from defendant client. Seche v. Tevco (DC CD Cal, 1995)
-
Represented junior party respecting inventorship of process for manufacture of high strength liquid crystal polymer materials. Hoechst v. Foster-Miller (PTO Bd Int, 1995)
-
Enforced obligations against patent agent in successful nine week bench trial. William Wrigley, Jr. Co. v. Waters, (DC SNY) 5 USPQ2d 1741 (Dec. 16, 1987), affd. 890 F.2d 594, 13 USPQ 2d 1125 (2nd Cir., 1989)
-
Represented JVC in contest respecting inventorship of videodisc resulting in termination of RCA videodisc business. JVC v. RCA (DC SNY, 1983)
-
Enforced pioneer holographic optical element patents against infringer. Instruments SA v. American Holographic, Inc. (DC Del, 1979)
TRADEMARK AND TRADE DRESS LITIGATION
-
Baby’s Coffee v. Hess et al (DC ?D Louisiana)
-
XXXXXXXXXXXXX Stay You, LLC v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP (DC SNY, 2023)
-
Dwarven Forge
-
Enforcement of MAX trademark
-
AJB v. Bed Bath and Beyond
-
XXXXXXXXXX Betches v. AwsomenessTV, Inc. (EDNY, 2016)
-
XXXXXXXXXXX Dayco Products, LLC v. Dorman Products, Inc (E.D. Mich., 2011)
-
Obtained for client an order enjoining trademark infringement after a decision introducing the legal theory of progressive encroachment to Second Circuit law. ProFitness Physical Therapy Center v. Pro-Fit Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy P.C., 314 F. 3d 62, 65 USPQ2d 1195 (2nd Cir., 2004)
-
Obtained a summary judgment in a declaratory judgment defense of a retailer in a jewelry design trade dress case. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. v. Philippe Charriol International, Ltd., 56 USPQ2d 1975 (DC SNY, 2000)
-
Defended retailers against alleged infringement of trade dress in handbags, obtaining favorable decision on summary judgment. Hermes International v. Lederer de Paris Fifth Avenue, Inc., 50 F.Supp.2d 212, 50 USPQ2d 1257 (DC SNY, 1999)
-
Successfully asserted London paper’s “The Times” trademark against newspaper in Tampa. Times Newspapers, Ltd. v. Times Pub. Co., 1993 WL 120614, 25 USPQ2d 1835, 21 Media L. Rep. 1065 (MD Fla., 1993)
-
Successfully asserted trade dress rights in television program. Score, Inc. v. Cap Cities/ABC, Inc., 724 F. Supp. 194, 13 USPQ 2d 1230 (DC SNY, 1989)
-
Successfully asserted trade dress rights in clothing in ground-breaking fashion industry case. BLI v. Heritage Quilts (DC SNY, 1978)
COPYRIGHT LITIGATION
-
Copyright case asserted against two Italian bros nick and 2019-2022?
-
Asserted copyright for costumes and succeeded in obtaining decision recognizing clothing as subject matter which may be protected by copyright law, overruling a longstanding tenet of the copyright law. Chosun International, Inc v. Chrisha Creations, Ltd. (2nd Cir., 2005)
-
Defended copyright infringement claim respecting Halloween costumes. Celebration International, Inc. v. Chosun International, Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 905, 2003 Copr.L.Dec. P 28, 562, 65 USPQ 2d 1504 (SD Ind., 2002)
​
​PUBLICATIONS
-
“Does the Power of the Internet Justify Changing Traditional Rules for Trademark Infringement?” · Intellectual Property Today, February 2009
-
“Intellectual Property Update: Inter Partes Reexamination Becoming Efficient and Effective in Removing Weak Blocking Patents” · Thompson Hine LLP Bulletin, September 2008
-
“Second and Fifth Circuits Clash on Copyright Protection for Costumes and Clothing” · Intellectual Property Today, October 2005

Protecting Your Innovation Through Strategic IP Litigation
Handal & Morofsky stands at the forefront of intellectual property litigation, delivering aggressive advocacy and sophisticated legal strategies to safeguard your most valuable assets. Our specialized practice focuses exclusively on the complex intersection of IP law and high-stakes litigation.
Uncompromising IP Defense & Enforcement
When your patents, trademarks, copyrights, or trade secrets face infringement or challenge, precision matters. Our battle-tested attorneys combine deep technical expertise with courtroom excellence to deliver results that protect your competitive advantage and bottom line.
Our Core IP Litigation Services
Patent Litigation & Strategy
-
Complex patent infringement disputes
-
Inter partes review (IPR) proceedings
-
Patent validity challenges and defense
-
Licensing negotiation and enforcement
Trademark & Brand Protection
-
Federal and state trademark litigation
-
Domain name disputes and cybersquatting
-
Counterfeiting and brand enforcement
-
Opposition and cancellation proceedings
Trade Secret & Confidential Information
-
Misappropriation claims and defense
-
Employee mobility and non-compete matters
-
Emergency injunctive relief
-
Corporate espionage investigations
Copyright & Digital Media
-
Software piracy and DMCA enforcement
-
Entertainment and media litigation
-
Fair use and transformative work disputes
-
Digital content protection strategies
Why Industry Leaders Choose Handal & Morofsky
Proven Track Record: Our attorneys have secured multi-million dollar victories and favorable settlements across diverse industries, from Fortune 500 corporations to innovative startups.
Technical Depth: We don't just understand the law—we understand your technology. Our team includes attorneys with advanced degrees in engineering, computer science, and other technical disciplines.
Strategic Thinking: Every case begins with comprehensive business analysis. We align legal strategy with your commercial objectives, whether that means aggressive enforcement, defensive positioning, or strategic settlement.
Efficient Execution: IP litigation demands speed and precision. Our streamlined processes and cutting-edge legal technology ensure responsive service without compromising thoroughness.
Industries We Serve
-
Technology & Software
-
Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences
-
Manufacturing & Industrial Design
-
Consumer Products & Retail
-
Entertainment & Media
-
Financial Services & Fintech
Ready to Protect Your IP Rights?
Don't let intellectual property theft or infringement threaten your business. Contact Handal & Morofsky today for a confidential consultation about your IP litigation needs.
Schedule Your Strategic Consultation